Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Citizens Rights

  1. #1

    Default Citizens Rights

    What Are the Right’s of A Citizen?
    “It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.” - Robert H. Jackson
    In order to truly comprehend what the rights of a citizen are, I believe we must first establish what a citizen truly is. A citizen, as defined by Webster Dictionary, is “a native or naturalized person who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to protection from it.”(Merriam Webster) I however, do not believe this statement does the “citizen” justice. Citizenship is a state of mind, and in an ideal democratic world, it to be cherished above all other. To be a citizen is to have true voice in the way he is governed, and to be able to lead the government in his own views. The citizen is, inherently, the basic building block of the modern nation-state. Without it, no other edifice of society can stand. A citizen, however, also has responsibilities to the state. Because he has been entrusted with such power, the citizen must be prepared to accept blame on behalf of his government. A citizen is, intrinsically, an extension of the state.


    Now that here is a basic understanding of what it means to be a “citizen,” it is now possible to explain what “citizen’s rights” really entail. In the U.S. a citizen does have many basic rights guaranteed by our Constitution. Among these rights are: the freedoms of speech, press, and religion; the right to keep and bear arms; the freedom of assembly; the freedom to petition; and the rights to be free of unreasonable search and seizure; cruel and unusual punishment; and compelled self-incrimination. Sadly now, as we move into this modern age, we are seeing that the governments of the world are again cracking down on citizen’s rights. As the U.S. finds itself in an apparently never ending war against the idea of “terrorism” (How can an idea be defeated?) we find that our rights are being degraded in the name of “security.” As less and less citizens even care how they are governed, as long as they are governed, more radical leaders seem to pop up. These leaders are elected because their supporters actually do care, while the vast majority of the populace slumbers on toward Armageddon. Unless the democracies of the world wake up, I fear that soon, all the rights that we hold dear will be lost forever to history, all for the omnipotent presence “of security.”


    I chose this topic because I really do care about the future of America, and the inherent rights of the American citizen. I want to establish what our rights truly are, and if they are really irrevocable. If our generation does not know when our rights are being taken away from us, how can we stop them?

    How has Citizen’s Rights Changed?



    The rights of citizens have changed greatly in the past few centuries. During the Medieval Ages, the average citizen’s rights shrank down to serfdom. As we passed out of the dark ages and into the Renaissance and the Age of Enlightenment, the rights of the citizen reappeared. Liberty and equality were the rallying cries of the poor across the world. This culminated in the United States Constitution and the French Revolution. As the world again makes a transition to the Information Age, a dividing point has been reached. We now have to balance personal securities and security issues.


    History gives us many examples of the rise and fall of citizen’s rights. The world took its first tentative steps forward with the Magna Carta, which forced English King’s to respect the writ of habeus corpus, meaning that a person could not be jailed without reason (Magna Carta). The Magna Carta formed the basis for the United States’ Bill of Rights. The United States Bill of Rights guaranteed a citizen’s rights to religion, petition, assembly, press, and speech, in addition to many others (United States Bill of Rights). The Bill of Rights has been used as a model for almost all of the subsequent democracies in the world, with most nations borrowing from the Bill of Rights in some regard.


    In the modern world, the advent of radical Islamic terrorism and the fear it has generated has resulted in some basic changes in citizen’s rights. The advance guard of this was the USA Patriot Act, which stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”(USA PATRIOT ACT). This act was passed in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trader Centers and the Pentagon, which killed 2,998 people in total. The act, which was approved with almost no debate and passed by wide-margins in both the House and Senate, (USA PATRIOT Act) has been criticized that it infringes upon civil liberties. One of the more controversial parts of the Patriot Act is the National Security Letter. These letters had existed before, but they were limited to use on foreign powers and they were voluntary. In 1993, the National Security Letters were amended so that they could be used on people who were not directly under investigation (National Security Letter). Now, with the USA PATRIOT Act, the FBI is allowed to search telephone, email, and financial records without a court order. This means that an FBI Agent needs no probably cause or judicial oversight for this action. The Letter could also include a gag order, which prohibits the recipient from even saying he was subject to such a letter. The letters are issued by FBI Field Supervisors, and receive no review from the Justice Department or Congress. In 2005, over 30,000 National Security Letters were issued, a hundredfold increase since their inception (Gellman A01).


    The Supreme Court has also had a major effect upon citizen’s rights. In Schenck v. United States (1919) the Supreme Court ruled that freedom of Speech can be limited during wartime, to preserve the country (Landmark Supreme Court Decisions). This allows the government to restrict the citizen’s right of free speech if the government feels the integrity of the country is in jeopardy. In Island Trees School District v. Pico (1982) The Supreme Court ruled that officials could not remove books from school libraries because they disagreed with the content of the books’ messages (Landmark Supreme Court Decisions). This was a victory for civil liberties because it allowed people to still learn from books, even if an establishment disagreed with them.

    In Texas v. Johnson (1989) The Supreme Court ruled flag burning as political protest is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment (Landmark Supreme Court Decisions). This protects the rights of citizens to protest against government actions that they see as illegitimate or illegal.


    The rights of citizens have gone increased and decreased over the past centuries. As the world changes, so too do civil liberties and the government’s responsibility to protect the citizen. Thankfully, the U.S. has its system of checks and balances to protect the citizen.

    What Still Needs to be Done?



    The rights of citizens have undoubtedly declined over preceding decades. During the Cold War, domestic and foreign spying was the norm in order to combat what was perceived as an ultimate evil. The Western world felt that in order to protect themselves, it might be necessary to give up some of their freedoms for greater security. Now though, as people begin to recover their lost rights after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, we are confronted again with this specter of evil. In the rise of militant Islam, we again find ourselves facing a new enemy, one more elusive than ever before. The U.S. government, in its prosecution of the war, has also degraded our civil liberties in the name of catching our enemies.

    The world of the twenty-first century is one of the most open and liberal societies ever to exist. With widespread access to cellular phones, satellites, and the internet, we now have the ability to communicate across the globe in a matter of seconds. The problem with such an open society is that it lies open to dangerous and deceitful attacks by those who would exploit it. Attacks can now be planned without ever setting foot near your target or seeing your counterparts. This makes it much harder for a government to foil plots that could be disastrous to the country. Governments have to balance the issue of allowing their citizens the full benefits of this new technology, or whether to crack down for the sake of security. If a government allows such liberty, it risks its own security in the face of those that would take advantage of it. If a government bans new technology, then it risks upsetting and alienating its own people, and may even force them to support your enemies.


    In this current age, we have many rights that are believe to be undeniable and sacred to us. Unfortunately, many have not seen that we have slowly been having our rights taken away from us. The PATRIOT Act has given the FBI the ability to spy on and arrest citizens at the slightest provocation, with no judicial oversight whatsoever.(USA PATRIOT ACT) Unless something is done, then it is probable that the future will only bring the further decline of citizen’s rights. Possibly the worst part is the prospect of our rights being even further degraded by a willing populace, just wanting to get the war over with. This is not some event that could happen far in the future, this is happening now.


    Citizen’s Rights can be saved though. Each and every citizen should contribute to the republic, and to its core principles. Right now, the American public slumbers while we are at war. As an anonymous person wrote, “America is not at war, the military is at war. America is at the mall.” This sums up the attitude of the American public to politics too. Too many voters are afflicted with chronic apathy at what this country does. As long as it does not hurt them immediately, many Americas could care less what happens outside their own town. This has to change! Without the average man voting, extremists from both wings can gain control of the government. If you don’t agree with any popular candidate’s message, find a lesser known one or even run yourself. America was founded on the common man, and the right of everyman to life, liberty, and happiness. If the current situation continues, then America may soon find itself deprived of all three.


    The world finds itself at a crossroads in the 21st century. In America, our rights are being degraded in order to combat terrorism. In the Middle East, women are forced into quasi-slavery, and minorities are persecuted publicly, even with the support of the government. America and the world will soon to wake up and find out how they are going to treat their citizen’s. Will they be slaves? Will they exist at the pleasure of the state? Or will they be treated as equal citizens, worthy of respect and emulation?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Citizens Rights

    Very thought provoking. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

  3. #3
    MasterOfNone's Avatar RTW Modder 2004-2015
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    16,707

    Default Re: Citizens Rights

    I am in general agreement with the piece, though I am not quite sure in what manner I am to critique it under the banner of "The Arts" forum...

    There are some grammatical and punctuation errors - mainly apostrophe problems (eg "What Are the Right's of A Citizen" should of course lose the apostrophe in "Right's").

    I felt there were a couple of inconsistencies (see below). This may be largely semantic, and I am rushing a bit so apologies if I have misunderstood anything....

    A citizen, however, also has responsibilities to the state. Because he has been entrusted with such power, the citizen must be prepared to accept blame on behalf of his government. A citizen is, intrinsically, an extension of the state.
    This statement seems to go against the gist of the rest of the article. Surely the reverse is true: that the state is merely an extension of the individual, an organization that gains its authority and validity from the organized individual right to self-defence? It is the state which is entrusted with power under the concept (as I believe you espouse) of natural rights. The state has nothing, under this concept, to entrust as it derives its just powers from the governed. Have I misunderstood your words?

    It seems clear to me from your article that you believe rights are inherent, natural in nature. Yet your wording does not always reflect this. For example "How has [sic] Citizen's [sic] Rights Changed?" would better be written "How Has The Perception of Citizens' Rights Changed?"

    I think, to give my response to your final concern and question, sacrificing liberty for security is never a good idea. The Republic (not Democracy - which they wisely rejected) that the Framers established is based on the Rule of Law. It does not change when threats come. It is true that measures in emergencies can be taken that would be otherwise wrong (on a personal level for example you might trespass on someone's property in order to avoid imminent death at the hand of a gunman), but these should certainly not be applied permanently or universally. In the end, the infringement of liberty is more the goal of the terrorist than a number of deaths. The action is in the reaction - as terrorists and facilitators of the same say

    I have personally found it very deceitful of governments to apply different laws to terrorist suspects. They are no different to any other type of suspect arrested in peace time in a country not personally invaded or in imminent threat of the same. When one looks at laws one should think - or assume - the suspect is innocent. That should be the basis. It underpins the presumption of innocence.

    The Magna Carta was indeed a good step forward in the Saxons regaining the recognition and protection of their rights from the European system imposed by the Normans. But it was not a first step. Go back to the Anglo-saxons and Israelites and you'll find a system based on inherent natural rights. Thomas Jefferson was a great scholar of these two systems and considered his work on the Constitution as a renaissance, so to speak, of the Anglo-saxon Common Law.

    The US Constitution does have a system of checks and balances - but these have been eroded very badly over the past 70 years or so. Again, this has happened because - as you say about rights - people have generally not understood them and therefore did not see the consequences of their passing.

    You might be interested in the view opined by the author of the videos in this link in connection with what the term "citizen" really means and implies >>> http://www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik

    Good article, scottishranger Well done.
    "One of the most sophisticated Total War mods ever developed..."
    The Fourth Age: Total War - The Dominion of Men

  4. #4

    Default Re: Citizens Rights

    Thanks. As to
    "How has [sic] Citizen's [sic] Rights Changed?" would better be written "How Has The Perception of Citizens' Rights Changed?"
    This was written for a school paper. I had specific topics I had to write about, and each little chapter was a different paper that had to have that title. If I had had it my way I would have written it differently, but hey, an A's and A.

    Your suggestion of the Israelites really intrigues me also. I was trying to find a way to beyond the norm of writing, but was having some trouble, so I went with Magna Carta. I will check out your suggestions.

    This statement seems to go against the gist of the rest of the article. Surely the reverse is true: that the state is merely an extension of the individual, an organization that gains its authority and validity from the organized individual right to self-defence? It is the state which is entrusted with power under the concept (as I believe you espouse) of natural rights. The state has nothing, under this concept, to entrust as it derives its just powers from the governed. Have I misunderstood your words?
    I tend to write without really planning it out. Sometimes I catch myself being hypocritical, sometimes I dont.

    I had a reflection paper that I would like to have added on their, I just have to find where I saved it.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Citizens Rights

    What This Means to Me


    We in the United States enjoy, in general, more civil rights that most other countries. The Bill of Rights outlines many of the rights that we hold most sacred to us, including the right to a fair trial and habeas corpus. I was startled to find out just how much the average person rights have declined in even the past eight years. The PATRIOT Act gives the government the ability to detain citizens without cause, and even imprison them. It is distressing that our government supports and agrees with these laws. In the past, such degradation of rights has often leaded to dictatorships and tyrannical government. I for one hope that historical precedent is not followed here.


    It is to our generation that falls the responsibility of preserving our civil rights. We must preserve our rights so that our children and grandchildren can enjoy the same rights we have. It is the duty of each generation to pass on to their children a world that is better than before. So far, the adult generation of this world is failing us. This might change in the future, it might not, but they are passing down a world that in my eyes is filled with problems created by previous generations. It is up to our generation to mend the world. This starts with maintaining and improving civil rights of all citizens. Without our basic freedoms to start our own initiatives, how can we fix the world’s problems? How can we solve the problems of our generation without the basic rights of man? The Founding Fathers agree with me, that is why they included the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. We must retain our civil rights, even in the face of these extraordinary challenges we face, for without our rights, we are powerless.
    It has been said that “To some generations, much is given, to others, much is asked.” It is obvious that much is being asked of our generation. I believe that it is our generation’s task to preserve the rights of the citizen and of very mankind. One final question remains though…are we up to the task?

  6. #6
    MasterOfNone's Avatar RTW Modder 2004-2015
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    16,707

    Default Re: Citizens Rights

    NP

    I'd recommend the NCCS books for learning more about the origin of the Framers' views as well as a lot of other great stuff - http://www.nccs.net/books.html
    "One of the most sophisticated Total War mods ever developed..."
    The Fourth Age: Total War - The Dominion of Men

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •