Search:

Type: Posts; User: StealthFox; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.27 seconds.

  1. Replies
    4,593
    Views
    424,054

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - Curial Commentary and Chat

    That's what I mean by not liking the discussion. But not liking the conduct goes along with that. I would have liked to see a warning first before closing it.
  2. Replies
    4,593
    Views
    424,054

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - Curial Commentary and Chat

    I don't think it's appropriate for the Curator to close a discussion because he doesn't like the discussion. It's appropriate for the curator to moderate the discussion to make sure it is civil, but...
  3. Replies
    26
    Views
    991

    [ABANDONED] Re: Evocatus Rank Act

    I support a separate designation to allow citizens to identify themselves as part of the roleplaying or mulitplaying area in the same way artifex denotes modding. I would not support any wording...
  4. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] Increase term durations for Curial Officers

    Opposed as I think that's too long for average members. If the problem is not having enough candidates apply for elections, I'd rather see us work to incentivize the offices or otherwise somehow...
  5. Replies
    91
    Views
    2,250

    [ABANDONED] Re: Armillae "Good Conduct" Award

    Opposed.

    As others have pointed out there are other awards that overlap with this, including citizenship itself, and citizens are expected to maintain good behavior, so it doesn't make sense to...
  6. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] Increase term durations for Curial Officers

    Okay, so a one month term wouldn't make much sense, but I'm still not convinced increasing it to four months would have any benefits that would outweigh potentially turning members away who wouldn't...
  7. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] Increase term durations for Curial Officers

    What are people's thought on the possibility that this might mean even less participation in elections as your average citizen would be hesitant to make a commitment for four months? What if...
  8. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] Move the Symposium & TWC's Living History Forum

    Support.
  9. [ABANDONED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] The Symposium, TWC's Living History Forum, and the Head Historian

    I'm fine with everything except merging Living History forum with Symposium. I think it makes more sense to restrict important past threads in an archive subform of the Symposium.
  10. Replies
    138
    Views
    5,102

    Re: Board of Directors Management

    I like the idea of having the elected Curial positions collectively form some sort of Curial Council, but I don't see yet what point it would be, what additional responsibilities/duties they'd have....
  11. Replies
    94
    Views
    3,532

    Poll: Re: What is the Symposium, to you?

    To preface my statement, I'm not saying we should suddenly go back to being more elitist, in fact I argued for disbanding CdeC way back when and have in the past argued for it being more of an award...
  12. Re: [Lotr Jokes and funny stuff] - One does not simply...

    Barad Dur Scratching Post :laughter:


    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/f0/3c/1b/f03c1b58e1e094e758a5fab6f8559590.jpg
  13. Replies
    7
    Views
    2,008

    Re: Did the mod ever had Legal issues? Why?

    The mod creators were very careful about this. In most cases they are using their own created work inspired by LotR books and films. Where content is taken from the film, in game videos for instance,...
  14. Re: [Election-XI-2017] Magistrate - Debate Thread

    What is your interpretation of the disruptive posting rule? Can you give us an example of a correct application of the rule and an incorrect one?

    Also, if ~Gort~ found his way into the Tribunal...
  15. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision] Eligibility Criteria for Milestone award

    Support.
  16. Replies
    21
    Views
    1,000

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Award] Frunk for Curia Service Award

    Support.
  17. Replies
    21
    Views
    911

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Award] Iskar for Curia Service Award

    Support
  18. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Amendment] Eligibility Criteria for Milestone award

    There might not be a vote, but that doesn't mean it can't be disputed. Somebody who doesn't get the award based off something that's subjective is going to eventually cry foul. What constitutes as...
  19. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Amendment] Eligibility Criteria for Milestone award

    I think it's better with either nothing or something stated more clearly. You're opening yourself to battles over interpretation of what counts as activity, and don't forget, this is the Curia where...
  20. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Amendment] Eligibility Criteria for Milestone award

    I support Hader's wording, but I'd also support Tango's suggestion of removing the activity requirement.
  21. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision] Archive the Curial Changes forum

    I'm with Halie, haha.

    I guess I don't really care in this particular instance. I'll probably abstain if it goes to vote.
  22. [ABANDONED] Re: [Discussion] Change the minimum requirements for new Citizens

    Opposed.
  23. [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] Archive the Symposium & allow non-legislative discussions in the CVRIA

    Opposed.
  24. Replies
    44
    Views
    3,756

    Poll: Re: What is the scope of the Constitution?

    ^^ Yep, that's exactly what I was going to say. So, I voted for option 3.
  25. Replies
    53
    Views
    4,490

    Poll: Re: The future of the Symposium, continued

    That sounds like a winning suggestion.
  26. Replies
    69
    Views
    5,446

    Poll: Re: The past and the future of the Symposium

    I'd be okay moving it as a subforum in the Curia, but I'm still against archiving it or merging it.
  27. Replies
    51
    Views
    3,351

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Amendment] Condensing Section I

    That's the way I feel too. I haven't commented on this because I'm not convinced this is an improvement, but I don't think it makes it any worse either. :dunno:
  28. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Decision]/[Amendment] TWC's Living History Forum

    I support this, but all the same I wish it wasn't rushed through after just a couple of days. The wording could use some work, for example something like, "The Head...
  29. Replies
    15
    Views
    1,357

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: Award: Flinn for Novus

    Finlander already summed up his content work nicely, but I'd like to add that when I was content hex, Flinn was definitely one of my best directors. Flinn's excellent work in content along with...
  30. Replies
    4,593
    Views
    424,054

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - General Chat and Commentary

    I can comment from my time in Hex. There was discussion in several threads about those proposals; they weren't ignored. To make a long story short, most parts of it we liked but other parts we...
  31. Replies
    69
    Views
    5,446

    Poll: Re: The past and the future of the Symposium

    Opposed for the reasons states by Halie and AL.
  32. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Award] GrnEyedDvl for Man of the Hour Award

    Support! :)
  33. Replies
    43
    Views
    2,814

    [ABANDONED] Re: [Decision] Open the Proth to full members

    Opposed for the same reasons as before.
  34. Replies
    4,593
    Views
    424,054

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - General Chat and Commentary

    Yes, you did miss my point. My very first sentence stated that I don't think it's productive to discuss the case. I mainly wanted to point out that the rule against discussing other members...
  35. Replies
    4,593
    Views
    424,054

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - General Chat and Commentary

    While I agree this isn't the best place and it certainly isn't productive to keep discussing enoch, the clause about discussing other members doesn't apply in the Curia, nor does most of the rest of...
  36. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: Amendment- Citizenship Removal Procedure Definition

    "Indefinite suspensions" are permanent in practice, but in fact that's not always the case. There have been instances where members have came back and appealed either directly to Hex or to the...
  37. Re: [Election-XVII-2016] Censor - Debate Thread

    Give us an example of an instance where a citizen has done something unbecoming of the behavior expected of them while not breaking the ToS of the site.
  38. Replies
    23
    Views
    2,147

    Re: Retire as LM

    NOOOOOOO!

    You can't leave! :no: :crying:

    :wavecry:
  39. Replies
    4,593
    Views
    424,054

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - General Chat and Commentary

    While I'm generally not a fan of the off the wall questions that usually aren't particularly relevant to application debates, can we please stop invoking the TOS using threatening languages such as...
  40. Replies
    19
    Views
    1,888

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Award] ElvenKind for OPIFEX

    Support. :)
Results 1 to 40 of 500
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4